When middle-class parents in California opened their newspapers recently and read that the leviathan Los Angeles Unified School District had overpaid their employees by $53 million, many likely took comfort in the belief that at least the school districts in their own cozy suburban neighborhoods were well managed. These parents, however, should think again.
School districts in middle-class and affluent communities across California have been the targets of investigations by grand juries and prosecutors. For example, last May a grand jury in conservative Orange County indicted the superintendent and assistant superintendent of the Capistrano Unified School District on several felony counts of misuse of taxpayer funds. With the median home price in the district in the upper six figures and with median household income above the state average, the community served by the CUSD is a far cry from poor urban school districts like Oakland and Compton, which have had highly publicized fiscal problems. Yet, the affluence of CUSD parents did not protect them from the alleged criminality of their public-school officials.
The Capistrano debacle started with discontent among parents over the skyrocketing cost of a planned district headquarters building. A local newspaper estimated the price tag at $52 million, double the original official estimate. Anger over this spending fiasco triggered a parent-supported recall campaign against school board members who backed the bureaucrats’ Taj Mahal. That, in turn caused district superintendent James Fleming, the highest paid superintendent in the county, to launch a vendetta against the parent-organizers of the recall.
Among other things, Fleming is alleged to have ordered his assistant superintendent to find out who among the supporters of the recall petition had children in Capistrano schools. Confidential pupil databases were allegedly used to search for the children of the petition circulators. In other words, Fleming is said to have created an illegal enemies list of parents and their children. Tony Rackauckas, the county district attorney, said: “We are bombarded with complaints from educators and parents that our schools are strapped for cash and children have to do with less. It’s a shame that resources were shifted away from students to create an unlawful list of political enemies.”
The Capistrano scandal is no anomaly. The San Mateo Unified High School District, located in a high-priced suburb just south of San Francisco, has been the focus of several recent grand jury investigations. One grand jury report found that the district faced a $164-million debt because costs for its construction projects far exceeded its construction budget.
The waste, corruption and the massive financial mismanagement in school districts in affluent areas like San Juan Capistrano and San Mateo demonstrate that middle-class parents are just as likely as other parents to have their tax dollars misspent by the government school system.
What is needed? Parents need school choice options and vouchers. In the end, parents would get the type of education they want for their children, delivered more effectively and efficiently, and public school officials would get a much needed wake-up call that they are in business to serve the public and not themselves.
A New Lesson for California School Superintendent
Lance T. izumi
When middle-class parents in California opened their newspapers recently and read that the leviathan Los Angeles Unified School District had overpaid their employees by $53 million, many likely took comfort in the belief that at least the school districts in their own cozy suburban neighborhoods were well managed. These parents, however, should think again.
School districts in middle-class and affluent communities across California have been the targets of investigations by grand juries and prosecutors. For example, last May a grand jury in conservative Orange County indicted the superintendent and assistant superintendent of the Capistrano Unified School District on several felony counts of misuse of taxpayer funds. With the median home price in the district in the upper six figures and with median household income above the state average, the community served by the CUSD is a far cry from poor urban school districts like Oakland and Compton, which have had highly publicized fiscal problems. Yet, the affluence of CUSD parents did not protect them from the alleged criminality of their public-school officials.
The Capistrano debacle started with discontent among parents over the skyrocketing cost of a planned district headquarters building. A local newspaper estimated the price tag at $52 million, double the original official estimate. Anger over this spending fiasco triggered a parent-supported recall campaign against school board members who backed the bureaucrats’ Taj Mahal. That, in turn caused district superintendent James Fleming, the highest paid superintendent in the county, to launch a vendetta against the parent-organizers of the recall.
Among other things, Fleming is alleged to have ordered his assistant superintendent to find out who among the supporters of the recall petition had children in Capistrano schools. Confidential pupil databases were allegedly used to search for the children of the petition circulators. In other words, Fleming is said to have created an illegal enemies list of parents and their children. Tony Rackauckas, the county district attorney, said: “We are bombarded with complaints from educators and parents that our schools are strapped for cash and children have to do with less. It’s a shame that resources were shifted away from students to create an unlawful list of political enemies.”
The Capistrano scandal is no anomaly. The San Mateo Unified High School District, located in a high-priced suburb just south of San Francisco, has been the focus of several recent grand jury investigations. One grand jury report found that the district faced a $164-million debt because costs for its construction projects far exceeded its construction budget.
The waste, corruption and the massive financial mismanagement in school districts in affluent areas like San Juan Capistrano and San Mateo demonstrate that middle-class parents are just as likely as other parents to have their tax dollars misspent by the government school system.
What is needed? Parents need school choice options and vouchers. In the end, parents would get the type of education they want for their children, delivered more effectively and efficiently, and public school officials would get a much needed wake-up call that they are in business to serve the public and not themselves.
Nothing contained in this blog is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of the Pacific Research Institute or as an attempt to thwart or aid the passage of any legislation.